Accessibility isn’t optional — it’s essential. From ensuring inclusivity for all users to meeting compliance standards like WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines), developers often face the challenge of testing their applications for accessibility gaps.
But what if AI could make this easier?
In this post, I’ll walk through how I built an AI-powered WCAG Accessibility Checker using Python, Streamlit, and the OpenAI API. The app allows you to paste in HTML, CSS, or JS code snippets and receive instant feedback on accessibility issues — plus suggested fixes.
Accessible design ensures that all users, including those with visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive impairments, can interact with your application. WCAG guidelines provide specific rules — like ensuring enough contrast between text and background, providing descriptive alt text, and maintaining logical heading structures.
Yet, manually checking compliance can be time-consuming. AI can help automate this process and guide developers with actionable feedback.
The accessibility checker works like this:
This reduces the manual overhead of accessibility testing while also teaching developers what “good accessibility” looks like in real code.
Here’s the core Python app:
(For whatever reason, I had to zip the .py file before I could attach it or even copy/paste the code into this post.)
pip install openai streamlit
wcag_checker.pystreamlit run wcag_checker.py
Here’s a preview of what the interface looks like:

When using the app, you’ll typically see two kinds of results:
For example:
<img>.”To make this more practical, here are some examples of what happens when you run different snippets through the AI-powered WCAG checker.
Code Snippet:
<input type="email" placeholder="Enter your email">
AI Feedback (sample result):
Issues Found:
- This input element is missing an associated
<label>.- Relying only on
placeholdertext fails WCAG 2.1 guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions). Placeholders disappear once the user types, which can create confusion and accessibility issues.Suggested Fix:
Wrap the input in a<label>element or use aforattribute to explicitly associate a label with the input.
Corrected Code:
<label for="email">Email Address:</label>
<input type="email" id="email" name="email">
Code Snippet:
<button>
<i class="fa fa-search"></i>
</button>
AI Feedback (sample result):
Issues Found:
- This button does not contain any accessible text. Screen readers will announce it only as “button,” which does not convey meaning.
- This fails WCAG 2.1 guideline 1.1.1 (Non-text Content).
Suggested Fix:
Add accessible text using either visible content oraria-label.
Corrected Code:
<button aria-label="Search">
<i class="fa fa-search"></i>
</button>
Code Snippet:
<button type="submit">Search</button>
AI Feedback (sample result):
Result:
- No accessibility issues detected.
- The button has a clear text label (“Search”), which meets WCAG requirements for non-text content.
By including these before-and-after transformations, the app becomes not just a compliance checker but also an educational tool. Developers don’t just see “pass/fail” — they see exactly why their code isn’t compliant and how to fix it.

Some directions this could go:
Accessibility should never be an afterthought. By leveraging AI, we can make it easier for developers to write inclusive, compliant code from the start.
The AI WCAG Checker is just one example of how AI can improve productivity and responsibility in modern software development.